|
DETERMINING THE ECONOMIC IMPACT
OF INTERNATIONAL MIGRATION AND IMMIGRATION
IN THE UNITED STATES
Lydio F. Tomasi*
Center for Migration Studies of New York
This
is a summary of the presentation at a workshop on immigration, which examined
the economic impact
of the newest immigrants, at The Moral Dimensions of Poverty Conference,
October 16, 1999. The complete paper is available through the Vincentian
Center.
Lydio F. Tomasi,
C.S. ordained a priest in the Missionaries of St. Charles/Scalabrinians,
serves as the Executive Director for the Center for Migration Studies
of New York and is the editor of International Migration Review and
Migration World Magazine. He has licentiates in Philosophy and Theology
from the Pontifical Gregorian University in Rome and earned his Ph.D.
in Sociology from New York University.
The
debate is still on regarding the economic impact of the newest newcomers
on unskilled native workers. The harsh exchange between George J. Borjas,
Professor of Economics at Harvard's Kennedy School and the author
of the new book, Heaven's Door and Jagdish Bhagwati, Professor
of Economics at Columbia University who recently reviewed Heaven's
Door in The Wall Street Journal (9/28/99) is one example. Each
of these professors claims that the facts are on his side.
It
would be nice to provide a single and incontrovertible answer to the seemingly
clear-cut question: What are the economic impacts of approximately 50
million migrant workers (i.e., those migrants in the 15 to 64 age group
of about 100 million international migrants), who move from developing
nations to industrialized democracies? Can the United States, for instance,
"afford" so many immigrants? By admitting immigrants is the
U.S. "importing poverty" (Hartnagel, 1999)? No clear-cut answer
to the question of the economic impact of immigration on the host country
can be derived from the available literature. While politicians and public
opinion makers tend to see migration inflows as mainly causing difficulties
to the native economy, much economic literature does not seem to support
this attitude. Economic analysis suggests the likelihood of desirable
effects particularly in relation to the problems generated by an aging
society (Ichimo, 1993).
This
paper has three goals:
 1.
to synthesize the state of the art knowledge about immigration as an economic
factor internationally; (It is very difficult to generalize about a complex
and changing phenomenon, so the reader must beware of oversimplification
and over generalization.)
 2.
to review major recent research findings concerning the United States
in order to provide a deeper appreciation of the toward and untoward economic
effects of immigration to the U.S.;
 3.
to share the author's conclusions, that on the whole, immigration
has marginal economic effects which are more positive than negative. Further,
the author agrees with Bhagwati that a defining principle of American
identity and one characteristic of American exceptionalism is that we
are a nation of immigrants.
Even
when we are inclined to surrender in times of distress to mean impulses,
moving to close "heaven's door" or to serve our own economic
ends in narrow (and often counterproductive) ways, Americans never seem
to lose their innate empathy for the immigrants who seek to join them.
Migration as an Economic Factor Internationally
Migration
is the most important international phenomenon that is not coordinated
by an economically oriented international organization. Yet it is one
of the most striking aspects of an intensive globalization of the world
economy. Borders are increasingly open to market forces and are being
penetrated much more effectively by goods, services and investment, as
well as by people (Stalker, 1994). Immigration must be understood in its
global context and as something "inextricably bound up with economic
and foreign policy, development, international trade and growing interdependence
as well as something often deliberately organized by employers and governments"
(Castles/Miller, 1993).
What
seems clear is that immigration has extremely unequal effects on different
social strata. Some groups clearly gain from policies facilitating large-scale
expansion of foreign labor migration while other groups (the migrants
themselves, blue collar and minority workers) lose. In general, one also
notices a bifurcation in the labor market effects of immigration upon
industrial democracies. Immigrant workforces are increasingly bipolar
with clustering at the upper [professionals/technicians (highly invisible
migrants)] and lower levels of the labor market.
Contexualizing
the topic of the international migration in a discussion of poverty, some
argue that the conflict between labor and capital is no longer the major
social issue in advanced societies. It has been replaced by the problem
of exclusion. Many immigrant groups have been forced into this situation
of exclusion and are doubly disadvantaged. They are not only amongst the
excluded of post modern societyeconomically maginalized through
low status, insecure work, poor education, living in urban and suburban
ghettos, but they have also come to be widely seen as the cause of the
problems. This "exclusion" may be a new name for "racism."
Research on the Effect of Immigrants on the U.S. Economy
For
the U.S., some studies argue that immigrants always have been, and will
continue to be, good for our economy. Other studies warn that, unlike
in earlier times, immigrants arriving today have and will continue to
have adverse effects on our economy and "undermine the very concept
of nationhood," "our way of life." Empirical data is used
to support opposite positions. The results of the studies vary because
their authors' choices of data sources and methodologies. Analyses
of the fiscal impacts of immigration cannot be separated from the social
effects and must focus on real life immigrants. The way to proceed is
to examine migration in a framework as dynamic as the phenomenon itself
giving attention to group processes associated with the history and contexts
of reception and of the national cohorts to which immigrants belong. Twenty-six
million immigrants and their millions of children, who are U.S. citizens,
will mostly stay. Their successes or failures in sorting out the challenges
of a complex society and finding viable economic niches will determine
the real long-term consequences of immigration.
Conclusions
In
a discussion of the moral dimension of poverty, the following conclusions
can be drawn from the research reviewed. The evidence suggests that immigrants
expand total output and the demand for labor, offsetting the negative
effects that a greater labor supply might have. Immigrants tend to be
highly productive and promote capital formation through high savings rates.
They fill vital niches at the ends of the skill spectrum, doing low-skill
jobs that native Americans rebuff as well as sophisticated highskill jobs
where demand is high. They add the vitality that a young new population
can bring to a country and in the long term bring economic benefits. They
also bring to us in the United States a responsibility to redouble our
efforts on behalf of America's underprivileged, and especially its
minorities faced with socio-economic exclusion. One of the great challenges
facing the United States in the 21st century is jobs for its
unskilled and lesser skilled workers. Full employment
remains the most fundamental economic and social objective for our society.
International migration should be regulated with a view toward the labor
market. Democratic governments, and particularly the United States, should
do much more to ensure comprehensive regulation of international migration.
Better protection of immigrants and their rights, as the United Nations
and the International Labor Organization have advocated, would have a
way of reducing the tensions that creep into analysis of immigration and
its economic effects.
REFERENCES
Asch, B. J., Ed. (1994) Emigration and its Effects
on the Sending Country. (Santa Monica, CA: RAND).
Bhagwati, J., " A Close look at the Newest Newcomers", The
Wall Street Journal, 9/28/99. Bohning, W. R. (1984) Studies in
International Labour Migration (London: Macmillan, New York: St. Martin's).
Borjas, G. J. (1990) Friends or Strangers: The Impact of Immigration
on the U.S. Economy (New York: Basic Books).
______ (1999) Heaven's Door: Immigration Policy and the American
Economy. (Princeton University Press).
Bouvier, L. F. and V. M. Briggs (1988) The Population and Labor Force
of New York: 19902050. (Washington, DC: Population Reference
Bureau, Inc.).
Bouvier, L. F. and P. Martin (1985) Population Change and California's
Future. (Washington, DC: Population
Reference Bureau, Inc.).
Bouvier, L. F. and D. Simcox (1994) Foreign Born Professionals in the
United States. (Washington, DC: Center for Immigration Studies).
Briggs, V. M. and S. Moore (1994) Still An Open Door? U.S. Immigration
Policy and the American Economy. (Washington, DC: The American University
Press).
Castles, S. and M. J. Miller (1993) The Age of Migration: International
Population Movements in the Modern World. New York: The Guilford Press).
Clark, R. et al. (1994) Final Impacts of Undocumented Aliens:
Selected Estimates for Seven States. (Washington, DC: The Urban Institute).
Espenshade, T. J., Ed., (1994) A Stone's Throw from Ellis Island:
Econmic Implications of Immigration to New Jersey.
(Lanham/New York/London. University Press of America).
Fix, M. and J. Passel (1994) Immigration and Immigrants: Setting the
Record Straight. (Washington, DC: The Urban Institute).
Hamermesh, D. S. and F. D. Bean, Eds. (1998) Help or Hindrance? The
Economic Implications of Immigration for African Americans. (New York:
Russell Sage Foundation).
Hartnagel, N. "ImmigrationPoverty." Catholic News Service,
September 3, 1999.
Ichino, A. (1993) "The Economic Impact of Immigration on the Host
Country" In G. Luciani, Ed. Migration Policies in Europe and the
United States. (Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Press, pp.
145162).
"International Migration, Fertility, and Development" (1994)
by Michael S. Teitelbaum and Sharon S. Russell in Population and Development:
Old Debates, New Conclusions. Ed. by Robert Cassen. (Washington, DC:
DDC, pp. 229252).
Jasso, G. and M. R. Rosenzweig (1990) The New Chosen People: Immigrants
to the United States. (New York: Russell Sage Foundation).
Light, I. and E. Bonicich (1988) Immigrants Entrepreneurs. (Berkeley:
University of California Press).
Martin, P. M. (1994) "Migration and Trade; Challenges for the 1990s"
in Development Issues. Presentations to the 48th Meeting of the
Development Committee, Washington, DC, April 26, 1994. (The World Bank,
pp. 97108).
McCarthy, K. and R. B. Valdez (1986) Current and Future Effects of
Mexican Immigration in California. (Santa Monica, CA: The RAND Corporation).
Muller, T. and T. J. Espenshade (1985) The Fourth Wave: California's
Newest Immigrants. (Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press).
Portes, A. (1999) "Models and Realities: The Consequences of Immigration."
Contemporary Sociology, 28(4): 387390.
Salt, J. (1989) "A Comparative Overview of International Trends and
Types, 1950-1980," International Migration Review, 23(3):431456.
Simon, J. (1989) The Economic Consequences of Immigration. (Cambridge,
MA: Basil Blackwell, Inc.).
Smith, J. and B. Edmonston Ed. (1998) The Immigration Debate: Studies
on the Economic, Demographic and Fiscal Effects of Immigration (Washington
DC: National Academy Press).
Spencer, S., Ed. (1994) Immigration as an Economic Asset: The German Experience.
London: IPPR.
Stalker, P. (1994) The Work of Strangers: A Survey if International
Labour Migration. (Geneva: ILO).
United Nations, Population Division (1994) Population Distribution
and Migration. Proceedings of the UN Expert Meeting on Population
and Migration, Santa Cruz, Bolivia, 1993.
U.S. Commission for the Study of International Migration and Cooperative
Economic Development (1990) Unauthorized Migration: An Economic Development
Response. (Washington, DC).
U.S. Department of Labor (1989) The Effects of Immigration on the U.S.
Economy and Labor Market. (Washington,
DC: U.S. Government Printing Office).
U.S. Department of Labor. Bureau of International Labor Affairs (1989)
The Effects of Immigration on the U.S. Economy and Labor Market.
(Washington, DC).
Vedder, R. (1994). "Immigration Doesn't Displace Natives."
The Wall Street Journal, March 28.
Vedder, R. L. Gallaway and S. Moore (1994). Immigration and Unemployment:
New Evidence. (Alexis de Tocqueville Institution).
Waldinger, R. et al. (1990) Ethnic Entrepreneurs: Immigrant Business
in Industrial Societies. (Newbury Park,London, New Delhi: Sage).
Werner, H. (1992) "Labor Market Trends and Migration from the Perspective
of the Single European Market" In L. F. Tomasi, ed., In Defense
of the Alien. (New York: CMS).
top
of page or
return to index of articles for 1999

The Vincentian
Center for Church and Society
copyright 2000-2003 - all rights reserved
send questions or comments about this site to John
Freund, C.M.
|